Capital Punishment in Canada Essay - 854 Words

Capital Punishment in Canada nbsp; As violence becomes an increasing concern among Canadians, people are calling for the reinstatement of capital punishment. This controversial issue has been ailing politicians and public morality since its abolition in 1976. As one examines the arguments for and against the reinstatement of capital punishment; examples of modern day cases dealing with capital punishment; and statistics on such cases, one can better appreciate the reasons why this barbaric form of punishment should remain in the past. nbsp; Unfortunately, like most Americans, many Canadians believe in the barbaric an eye for an eye rule of restitution. This belief is the basis for the argument for the reinstatement†¦show more content†¦I didnt tie anybody to a stretcher. I didnt pump poison into anybodys veins from behind a locked door. You call this justice. I call this and your society a bunch of cold-blooded murderers. (Infamous last words) nbsp; This statement, and others like it, has raised morality questions which haunt politicians and citizens alike. When the state takes away ones life, how is this action more moral than the original crime? The government represents its people. When the government condones such morbid actions to be taken place legally, what message does this send out to its people? The answers to these questions can be seen in the statistics offered by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. This report offers the following facts: nbsp; At the end of 1998, the US held 3,452 prisoners on death row, which is a 4% increase from 1997. On December 31, 1998, the youngest death row inmate was 18 years old and the eldest was 83. The average age was 38 years old. As of the end of 1998, the execution of prisoners 16 years old or younger was permissible in a dozen states. Eight of which did not specify a minimum age for which the death penalty could be imposed. 34 of the 38 capital punishment states use lethal injection. Electrocution is the sole execution method in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, and Nebraska. Delaware, New Hampshire and the state of Washington permit hanging as a method of execution. Idaho, Oklahoma, and Utah authorize firing squads.Show MoreRelated Capital Punishment in Canada Essay2901 Words   |  12 Pages Capital punishment is crimes most dreaded consequence, death. Hanging was Canadas form of capital punishment up until 1976 when it was abolished. Websters Dictionary defines capital punishments as: The penalty of death for the commission of a crime. (Websters, 1994, 43). The chance of capital punishment being reinstated in Canada has been very slim up until now. Recently the Canadian Alliance Party has put forth efforts to reinstate it, which has put the controversial topic back upRead MoreA Look on the Impact of Capital Punishment in Canada1240 Words   |  5 PagesCapital punishment was the most severe punishment within the Canadian Justice system before it was abolished in the 1970’s. It is still used in many other countries around the world such as the United States, China and India, as it is believed to lower the crime rate within their country. Capital punishment was basically a form of torturing the suspect, but to their death as a consequence of their heinous crim e. Many believe that capital punishment should be reinstated into Canada, while others areRead MoreShould Capital Punishment Stay Illegal in Canada?636 Words   |  2 Pagesone of the reasons why I think it should remain illegal in Canada. The sentence doesn’t deter crime, (citation needed) and in some cases it only exasperates the crime which it was supposed to deter. Also, in order to keep an inmate on death row it costs on average ninety thousand dollars more than keeping an inmate for a life sentence, in the United States (Baskey-East, S. 2014). California has approximately the same population of Canada, and it uses the death penalty (37 million and 35 million peopleRead MoreCapital Punishment Infringes Upon Human Rights and Should Not be Reinstated in Canada2570 Words   |  11 PagesIn today’s society, capital punishment is a particularly controversial issue. The death penalty known for its barbaric form of punishment began in 1892 lasting for 69 years before bill C-84 was passed by the House of Commons resulting in the removal of the death penalty. Although capital punishment has been abolished for 48 years, society still has mixed opinions on whether our country would benefit by reinstating capital punishment or if it would be better to respect individual rights and keep themRead MoreThe Canadian Justice System And Capital Punishment1713 Words   |  7 Pagessystem in its views on capital punishment. Two men, Arthur Lucas, and Ronald Turpin was to be executed in Canada for committing crimes. Both had been accused of committing murder, Lucas for killing an officer while fleeing a robbery and Turpin for murdering an undercover narcotics officer. Both were hanged back to back at midnight and buried side by side with no marking on their graves. Lucas and Turpin were the last to be executed under capital punishment and since then Canada has stopped this practiceRead MoreCompartive Legal Systems Canada vs Usa1691 Words   |  7 PagesComparative Legal Systems (Canada vs. USA) Thesis: Canadas criminal justice system, specifically laws dealing with punishment, is far superior to that of the United States Canada and the United States of America are two neighboring countries who besides the border share numerous other key aspects. Though similar in beliefs and culture the two countries are far from alike. Their legal structure particularly the penal system is one of most significant boundaries between Canada and the United States.Read MoreCapital Punishment Deters Murder, and Is Just Retribution1364 Words   |  6 PagesCapital Punishment Deters Murder, and Is Just Retribution Capital punishment, is the execution of criminals by the state, for committing crimes, regarded so heinous, that this is the only acceptable punishment. Capital punishment does not only lower the murder rate, but it s value as retribution alone is a good reason for handing out death sentences. Support for the death penalty in the U.S. has risen to an average of 80% according to an article written by Richard Worsnop, entitled DeathRead MoreThe Abolition Of The Death Penalty1552 Words   |  7 Pagespenalty is used as a form of punishment in the eastern hemisphere for many crimes, such as espionage, terrorism, and first-degree murder. China holds the record for the largest amount of executions; the number remains largely disputed as death penalties are considered â€Å"state secret.† In some Middle Eastern countries crimes such as rape, adultery and theft also carry a death sentence. Canada is no stranger to capital punishments either. The first recorded death penalty in Canada was in 1749, as a sailorRead MorePunishing Criminals by Death Will Deter Future Crimes...or Not?1216 Words   |  5 Pagesexample of Canada. How crime was not deterred by the imposition of death penalty as a tool used by the system of justice. The essay states some of the research that has been conducted with the intention of proving that capital punishment can deter crimes. This paper points out the effects and imposition of capital punishments on criminal activities. The paper finally makes a conclusion on the issue of capital punishment as deterrence. Introduction Many people assume that punishment by deathRead MoreCapital Punishment And Its Economic, Political, And Social Impact On The United States Of America1739 Words   |  7 PagesINTRODUCTION Capital punishment, also frequently referred to as the  death penalty, is a government certified practice where a person is put to death by the state as a form of punishment for a crime they have committed (Henderson, 25). Crimes that are found punishable by death are referred to as  capital crimes  or  capital offences, and commonly include offences such as murder, treason, war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide (Henderson, 48-9). The term  capital  is derived from the  Latin term

Psy/220- Week 1 Check Point- Positive Psychology Themes Free Essays

Positive Psychology Themes I believe that positive psychology gives a better understanding that we are able to improve the quality of our own lives by making positive decisions and learning from experiences in the past. Positive psychology attempts to encourage interpersonal relationships, happiness, and positive social interactions. Personal growth and our ability to control our own destiny are also factors of positive psychology. We will write a custom essay sample on Psy/220- Week 1 Check Point- Positive Psychology Themes or any similar topic only for you Order Now In my opinion positive psychology teaches us that we have the freedom to make autonomous choices in life even though the negative influences still surround us. Through the incremental theory, positive psychology has stressed the amount of importance of human adjustment as a malleable cognitive characteristic that encourages change in our beliefs, behaviors, and environments; in order to acquire personal freedom through self-control and self-esteem Positive psychology acknowledges that we are creatures and creators of our personal and social worlds. I think that we become less creatures of our world and more creators as we assume the responsibility for the actions we take in life. Through our freedom of autonomy we develop a certain sense of morality and ethics. Positive psychology also evaluates the issue of control in relation to leading a fulfilling life. If a person has an internal locus of control they are more likely to push to achieve their full potential in the things they do. On the other hand those with an external locus of control feel powerless within their own lives and attempt to settle for less than what they deserve because they feel they have no control over their life. If we were to fully understand the themes of positive psychology we could become more qualified to improve our own lives. How to cite Psy/220- Week 1 Check Point- Positive Psychology Themes, Papers

Perception Process and Factors Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Perception Process and Factors. Answer: Introduction Perception is the process by which an individual organize and interpret sensory information. It describes the way an individual filter, arrange and interpret information. An appropriate perception enables an individual to make accurate decisions. An inappropriate perception leads to the occurrence to many problems that affect the growth of an organization. Perception depicts how an individual determines, organizes and examines information inputs in order to develop a meaningful picture. It depends on the physical stimuli and also on the relation stimuli to the surrounding field. Perception varies from one people to another which influences their decision-making process (Davis, Palladino and Christopherson, 2013). Personal characteristics that influence perception includes persons attitudes, past experiences, motives interest and expectations. There are many factors that shape or distort perception. The managers of any organization should determine and interpret situations in an appro priate manner. The decisions of an individual are greatly influenced by its perception. The desires and need of an individual can influence its perception. Main context Factors that distort and limit perception The perception is depicted as a process by which the individual organizes and interprets the sensory perceiving for the purpose of providing meaning to the environment. It perceives the substantial different objectives which are used for determining the objectives in a reality way. The perception is depicted to be important for the study of the behaviour of the people are based on their perception and also the reality is being considered while undertaking the perception into the study (Del Missier, Mntyl and Bruin, 2011). The perception is also defined as the process by which the individual organizes, interprets and selects the input information to create a meaningful picture of the world. This simply illustrates the physical stimuli which are surrounding the reaction as present in this field. The key point is established to be illustrating the exposure of the key points and the knowledge regarding the same reality. Some of the characteristics are the fast talking, aggressive and the insincere attitude. The response to these characteristics might be different as well as similar with depending on the situation that is raised in front of the receiver. As per the factors are considered, there are a number of the factors that are responsible for distorting the perception of the individual which is depicted to be residing the perceiver in the object, and also it targets the perceiver (Ehrich, Flanders and Soechting, 2008). The following are the factors which are provided in the following points: Factors in the perceiver include the attitudes, motives, interests, expectations and the experiences. Factors in the situation include the work setting, time and the social settings. Factors in the target include the size, sounds, novelty, proximity, motion and the similarity (Troscianko and Smith, 2010). The explanation is surrounding the individual when it looks at the target for the purpose of interpreting; it is depicted to be heavily influenced by the personal characteristics as it is being represented in this case. The individual characteristics are illustrated by illustrating the effect of perception on the persons attitude and also the personal motives or the interests. The expectation of being authoritative is characterized by the individual characters and the presence of the internal attractive and the unattractive characteristics (Goode, 2017). These arise due to the cultural traits, and also the characteristics are identified to be showing the observation of the effect in the form of the effect made to the target. The voice of the people is depicted to be illustrating the extremely attractive and the unattractive characteristics of the targets. It is because the isolation and the relationship of the target are being considered and also the background is depicted to be infl uenced with considering the perception (Goyal and Gurtoo, 2011). For example, the women people of the distinguished groups are depicted to be varying with the personal colours and also the perceived characteristics are determined by illustrating the unrelated links. The shrill voice is also never perceived by the individual authority in which the practical involvement of the features and the colour are often depicted to be perceived. The regular characteristics are also included in the form of the practices, and also the voice can be easily lowered with depicting the slower temptations of the people. The threat of the content is also included in the form of the time which varies with the time and the objects. The time is depicted to be influencing the attention, location, heat, light and also the other situational factors. These characteristics are represented while the outings are considered for the individual people. Several characteristics of the perceiver are depicted to be affecting the perception in the form of the individual views regarding the target. The attempt of the interpretation is also depicted to be varying characteristics interpretation made by an individual person. The personal characteristics are also carried out by illustrating the individual perceiver and also the major factors are illustrated in the form of the attitudes, moods, self-concept, motives and the expectations with the interests (Harrington, 2013). In this way, the affecting of the individual perceptions can be easily identified and also the negotiation of the contracts with the suppliers is depicted in the context of the organization. By this process, the specific characteristics of the perceiver are being revealed, and also it becomes easier to know the individual characteristics in an appropriate way. These characteristics can be easily depicted to be showing the enhancement of the workings in the form of the env ironmental situation and also the influence can be easily measured with depicting the bias characteristics. The characteristics of the target are depicted to be observed in the form of the effect which is being perceived by illustrating the physical appearance. The perceiver is depicted to be showing the focus on the physical appearance as it is concentrating on the form of the physical features. The appropriate focus is being made which also varies with the perception of the perceiver and also the intentions of the target can be easily depicted (Hayes, 2011). The conveying of the information to the deal is depicted to be an attempt which is being made by illustrating the impression of the target. The tendency of the perception is being explained to perceive the information regarding the movements and also the tendency of the groups can be easily explained in the form of the similar things. Factors that are influencing the perception is including the frequently used shortcuts in providing judgment to others, selection perceptions and the stereotypes. These techniques are not depicted to be fool proof, and also these are depicted to be inaccurate with the perceptions which also include the disruption of large information. The disruptive characteristics can be easily supporting the perceptions of the information which is including the background and the interest in also influencing the individual attitudes (Hellriegel and Slocum, 2011). The ongoing interests are also distracted by these factors and also the inaccuracy is raised in the communication of information. Therefore, the attractive characteristics are provided in the form of the variation of the attitudes and the influences which are made to be illustrating the workings for the mitigation of the influences. The influences must be mitigated by illustrating the hearings which are also included to be a part of the wo rk which is also illustrated to be showing the impression errors. The evaluation of the errors must be made in an appropriate way for the purpose of illustrating the comparisons that are raised for the purpose of depicting the contrast principles (Kinley, 2015). The engagement of the distortions in the form of the response is being depicted by illustrating the engagement of the theories in the form of the influences undertaken in the individual. Overcoming the problem Peoples attributions and perceptions influence how they think and behave. Appropriate perception allows an individual to interpret what they hear and see that helps them to make decisions and accomplish tasks in an ethical manner. In order to make an appropriate decision, an individual should determine and analyze the situation, be aware of the biases and enhance creativity. Each individual has its own biases or preferences that enable them to interpret information. Thus, an individual should determine its own biases and preferences while interpreting information (Kreitner and Kinicki, 2013). Many people rely on the information that they receive from others. If the individual is not involved closely in the problem situation, then they would not have the necessary knowledge and information to make decisions. People find themselves in ambiguous and unfamiliar situations in the organizations. An effective business professional is able to handle objections by describing others about the benefits of their position. By recognizing actively peoples attributions and perceptions, an effective leader is able to develop justifications for their strategies and approach. People react to a situation on the basis of what they think about the prevailing situation (Lefton and Brannon, 2008). Attributions and perception can be inaccurate which imposes significant on the organization. Providing adequate training will help the people to examine and react to a situation in an appropriate manner. It helps to create a friendly work environment because different have different cultural backgrounds. Individuals tend to interpret other individuals on the basis of their ability, personality, and efforts. The perception and attributions of an individual influences their work performances (Maund, 2014). An employee who has succeeded in tasks usually leads to the increase in the confidence level and those who failed consider themselves as an unlucky person or even blame others. People's judgment and perception of action of another person depend on if the reactions occur inconsistently or consistently. Recognizing people's motives, intentions and cultural beliefs help to explain their behaviour and rectifying the non-productive circumstances. By understanding the causes of behaviour, an individual can behave and react in an appropriate manner. Minimizing biases that limit and distort attribution and perception can help to enhance team work (Qureshi and Harani, 2014). The use of different tools and techniques can help the organizations to decrease the rate at which an individual interprets events selectively on the basis of their backgrounds, attitudes, and experience. Providing training to the managers can help them to make accurate perception that assists them to conduct performance reviews daily management tasks and performance reviews. The control of emotions is very much important dewing the decision-making process. Personal characteristics influence the perception of an individual, and it is important to recognize the negative impact of these characteristics. There are many factors that contribute in influencing the perception of an individual. People should have control over their moods while interpreting a situation. An individual should control its need and make the appropriate decision. If an individual is able to control its emotions, then he or she can make appropriate perception that helps them to make a decision (Santrock and Mitterer, 2006). An appropriate guidance and training to an individual will help them to make the appropriate decision. The focus can also be given on creative thinking skills, expertise, and intrinsic task motivation. An individual should interpret things on the basis of what they see while making judgments. An individual should be fair while making decisions and be appropriate in making interpretations. The managers in an organization should have the skills and knowledge that helps them to make interpretation (Schwartz, 2010). Training and adequate guidance help an individual to make appropriate perception and make decisions. People should not interpret on the basis of what they see such as individuals interest, altitudes, background, and experience. People should not draw general impressions about other people on the basis of their characteristics. People should not judge someone on the basis of the group to which he belongs. Every day, people depend on generalization because it helps them to make decisions. It should be understood by an individual that a wrong perception leads to the wrong decision (Shedid and Benzel, 2007). The managers of an organization should understand and analyze situations before making any decision. People should have a control on their personal characteristics such as self-esteem and conscientiousness that affects their perception. The focus should be on the depth analysis and importance on the rationality and logic will also enable to make bias decisions. It is also found that perceptual judgments are inaccurate that lead to the inaccurate decisions while selecting candidates in the interview. Many subjective components should be taken into account for evaluating the employees. Conclusion The overall study is surrounding the factors that are limiting and distorting our perceptions, and also these characteristics are determined to be developing bias in the attitude of each individual as well as the organization. The overcoming techniques and the methods are well described in this study which is surrounding the individuals as well as the organizations. The perception factors are well interpreted with the overcoming techniques to provide the appropriate structure to this study and also the characteristics are well described in an appropriate way (Robbins and Judge, 2017). The enhancement of the study is also made by explaining the limiting and the distorting factors with determining the appropriate judgment for the study as it had been undertaken. Thus the importance of the discussion is being depicted by illustrating the meaning of the perception of the limiting factors. The methods of overcoming these limiting factors are well explained by the help of the theories rela ted to the organization as well as the individual behaviours. References Davis, S., Palladino, J. and Christopherson, K. (2013).Psychology. Boston: Pearson. Del Missier, F., Mntyl, T. and Bruin, W. (2011). Decision-making Competence, Executive Functioning, and General Cognitive Abilities.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(4), pp.331-351. Ehrich, J., Flanders, M. and Soechting, J. (2008). Factors Influencing Haptic Perception of Complex Shapes.IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 1(1), pp.19-26. Goode, E. (2017).Deviant behavior. [Place of publication not identified]: Routledge. Goyal, P. and Gurtoo, S. (2011). Factors Influencing Public Perception: Genetically Modified Organisms.GMO Biosafety Research. Harrington, K. (2013).Perception. London: Scholastic. Hayes, N. (2011).Psychology. London: Hodder Education. Hellriegel, D. and Slocum, J. (2011).Organizational behavior. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning. Kinley, N. (2015).Changing Employee Behavior. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Kreitner, R. and Kinicki, A. (2013).Organizational behavior. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Lefton, L. and Brannon, L. (2008).Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Maund, B. (2014).Perception. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis. Qureshi, F. and Harani, D. (2014). Factors Affecting Employees Perception for Procedural and Distributive Justice.World Journal of Management, 5(2), pp.78-91. Robbins, S. and Judge, T. (2017).Organizational behavior. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. Santrock, J. and Mitterer, J. (2006).Psychology. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson. Schwartz, S. (2010).Visual perception. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical Pub. Division. Shedid, D. and Benzel, E. (2007). Decision Making Process: Problem-Based Decision Making.Neurosurgery, 60(suppl_1), pp.S1-166-S1-169. Troscianko, T. and Smith, A. (2010).Perception. London: SAGE.

The Lieberman Factor Essays - Baalei Teshuva, Joe Lieberman, Al Gore

The Lieberman Factor The Lieberman Factor The repercussions of Democratic Presidential candidate Al Gores seminal selection of Senator Joseph Lieberman as his running mate are not only helping to decide the presidential election, but also are being felt on the wider national Jewish and political scenes. The Vice Presidential selection was a transparent attempt by Gore to distance himself from President Clintons scandals. Joe Lieberman has often been referred to as the conscience of the Senate. He has repeatedly denounced the pornographic and violent products of Hollywood. Lieberman was also the first Democrat in the Senate to denounce Clinton during the Lewinsky affair, though he didnt vote for impeachment. The political wisdom of Gores pick of Leiberman was immediately confirmed. Gore had been trailing 17 points in the polls prior to the selection of Lieberman, but within a few days Gore was tied with Bush in the polls. At that time there was a chorus of approval for Lieberman. Literally, no one had anything bad to say abou t him. Indeed, Republican Vice-Presidential candidate Dick Cheney stated his wish that Lieberman was a Republican. The one element that now permeates Liebermans public persona has been his religion. He is of course the first Jewish Vice Presidential candidate. Yet, if Lieberman were just ethnically Jewish, he would not be as historically unique as he is. There have been Jewish Prime Ministers in Europe, such as Leon Blum of France. Unlike those men, Lieberman is an Orthodox Jew. For the Jewish community this appointment is critical, because both the Jewish right and left constantly assert that the only way that the Jewish people can be acclimated to modern society is at the expense of the Torah. Joe Lieberman may help prove this concept wrong. Lieberman, an Orthodox Jew and a Senator at the same time, was chosen precisely because of his religion, from where his morals stem. Lieberman has spread his belief that religion must play a more prominent role in public life, on the campaign trail. Thus, he has been accused of attempting to violate the separation of church and state. Religion has held a helpful and constructive role in the general outlook of Presidents since Washington. In fact, Lieberman has referred to Washington's statement that there is no morality without religion. Both Jefferson and Lincoln constantly called upon G-d in their writings. Truman wrote a letter to the Pope referring to America as a Christian nation. Eisenhower inserted in the national anthem under god and the national currency in God we trust. What animated the thought systems of these men was the idea that a higher deity, or history, or destiny, was on their side. This idea served as a way to legitimize the often-unsavory means to acomplish vastly important ends, such as when Eisenhower overthrew the socialist, democratically elected leader of Guatemala. This act on a small scale destroyed democracy in one Central American country, but on a larger scale kept the Western Hemisphere safe for democracy. Through this habit of mind various Presidents used religion to validate secular goals. This practice, though necessary, has always been dangerous too. First of all, there is the pernicious temptation of breaking ones own principles temporarily to establish them later on. Secondly, there is the need to maintain the separation between church and state. From Liebermans acceptably vague call for more religion in public life, it is not a long road to Bushs unacceptably specific Jesus day. Sometimes the line between beneficial and right use of religion and destructive and wrong use of religion can get so blurred that there is no line at all. It is too soon to tell how Lieberman and his religious beliefs will effect the election, the Jews and the nation. Political Issues